Nasher Museum of Art

  • 1995_11_6_v1_700

    Russian, Organize nurseries, kindergartens, factories, kitchens, dining halls, mechanical laundries – Thus we can free 1,600,000 new workers for the fulfillment of the Five Year Plan, 1931. Lithograph in colors on paper, mounted on linen; 28 1/2 x 20 1/2 inches (72.4 x 52.1 cm). Collection of the Nasher Museum of Art at Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. Gift of Richard Segal, 1995.11.6.

  • 1992_8_1_v1_700

    Vitaly Komar and Alex Melamid, Stalin with Hitler’s Remains, 1985. Oil on canvas, 84 1/4 x 60 1/4 inches (214 x 153 cm). Collection of the Nasher Museum of Art at Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. Museum purchase, 1992.8.1. © Vitaly Komar and Alex Melamid.

  • 1997_34_1_v1_700

    Leonid Sokov, Study for Lenin and the Devil, 1991. Gold foil on plaster with plastic devil, 12 x 12 x 11 inches (30.5 x 30.5 x 27.9 cm). Collection of the Nasher Museum of Art at Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. Gift of John Schwartz, 1997.34.1. © Leonid Sokov.

  • The Old Scholar

    Artist unknown, Russian, The Old Scholar, 19th century. Oil on canvas, 21 7/8 x 17 5/8 inches (55.6 x 44.8 cm). Collection of the Nasher Museum of Art at Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. Gift of Irene Chapellier Little, 2000.3.1.

Background

When Russia adopted Christianity in the late 10th century, Russian artists began incorporating influences from Byzantine art and architecture into their own local traditions. Perhaps most notable are the Russian icons, or paintings of saints, with gold backgrounds. Other subject matter, including portraiture, landscapes, and history painting, became more common in the 17th and 18th centuries. The 19th century saw the rise of everyday genre scenes and the graphic arts. Artistic experimentation seemed to explode in the early 20th century, amidst a period of political and social unrest. While some artists drew upon national or folk traditions, others were inspired by artistic developments in Western Europe. Styles ranged from realism to abstraction. Artists blurred the traditional boundaries between different art forms.

Then, in 1917, when the Russian tsar was deposed and the Bolsheviks seized power, art was mobilized for its propagandistic power. In particular, posters, which could be mass-produced and therefore distributed widely, became an increasingly important medium for building the Communist state.[1] With easy-to-understand and brightly-colored imagery, posters communicated messages about current events, political and social developments, daily life, official culture, and education that even the illiterate population could comprehend. Poster production came under strict ideological control in 1931. Three years later, in 1934, it was announced that Socialist Realism was to be the official visual language of all the arts on public display. Socialist Realism presented idealized images of life in the Soviet Union, images that the government wanted the people to see. Artists who wanted to create other types of art had to do so covertly.The artists who intentionally went against Socialist Realism from the late 1950s to the late 1980s are known as nonconformist artists. They incorporated a wide range of styles and addressed a variety of subject matter, especially those that were officially taboo. In the 1970s and 1980s two general trends emerged among unofficial artists: Moscow Conceptualism and Sots Art. Moscow Conceptualism is an ironic analysis of Soviet discourse. These artists combined text and imagery, experimented with performance art, photography, and installation, and emphasized documentation.  Sots Art is like the Soviet response to Pop Art, with the visual languages of Soviet mass culture and Socialist Realism as the focus of parody and critique.[2] Some architects also challenged official culture. Beginning in the late 1980s, a group of architects “realized” utopian architectural projects on paper, a practice that became known as “Paper Architecture.” With the fall of the Berlin Wall and the subsequent dissolution of the Soviet Union,  nonconformist and conceptual artists began working more openly and exhibiting internationally.

Questions

  • What artistic traditions do you think the artist drew upon? How did s/he transform them? For what reason?
  • What traditions do you think the artist challenged and/or rejected? For what reason?

  • How does the visual imagery—the form, color, size, medium, etc.—help to convey the artwork’s message?
  • What message(s) does the work communicates? Who do you think the artist was addressing? Why do you think this?
  • Do you think the artwork communicates an official government message, or at least a message that the government would have approved of? What makes you think this?
  • Does the artwork critique the government and official culture? What is being critiqued and how so?

Want to Know More?

Works in the Nasher’s Collection

Duke Libraries’ Russian Posters Collection, 1919-1989 and undated.

Bibliography

Andreeva, Ekaterina. Sots Art: Soviet Artists of the 1970s–1980s. Roseville East: Craftsman House, 1995.Angels of History: Moscow Conceptualism and its Influence. Exh. cat. Antwerp: MuHKA, 2005.

Badovinac, Zdenka, Joseph Backstein, et al. Body and the East: From the 1960s to the Present. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1999.

Balina, Marina, Nancy Condee, and Evgeny Dobrenko, eds. Endquote: Sots-Art Literature and Soviet Grand Style. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2000.

Berlin—Moscow: 1950-2000. Exh. cat. Berlin: Martin Gropius Bau; Moscow: State Tretiakov Gallery, 2004.

Bown, Matthew Cullerne. Contemporary Russian Art. Oxford: Phaidon Press, 1989.

Degot, Ekaterina. Contemporary Painting in Russia. Sydney: Craftsman House, 1995.

Dickerman, Leah, ed. Building the Collective: Soviet Graphic Design, 1917–1937; Selections from the Merrill C. Berman Collection. New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 1996.

Dodge, Norton, and Margarita Tupitsyn. Apt Art: Moscow Vanguard in the ‘80s. Washington, D.C.: Washington Project for the Arts, 1985.

Forbidden Art: The Postwar Russian Avant-Garde. New York: D.A.P./Distributed Art Publishers, 1998.

Global Conceptualism: Points of Origin, 1950s–1980s. Exh. cat. Flushing: Queens Museum of Art, 1999.

Goodman, Susan Tumarkin, ed. Russian Jewish Artists in a Century of Change, 1890–1990. Exh. cat. New York: Jewish Museum, 1995.

Gray, Camilla. The Russian Experiment in Art, 1863-1922. Revised and updated by Marian Burleigh-Motley. London: Thames & Hudson, 1986.

Hoptman, Laura and Tomáš Pospiszyl, eds. Primary Documents: A Sourcebook for Eastern and Central European Art since the 1950s. Cambridge and London: MIT Press, 2002.

Neumaier, Diane, ed. Beyond Memory: Soviet Nonconformist Photography and Photo-Related Works of Art. Exh. cat. New Brunswick and London: The Jane Voorhees Zimmerli Art Museum and Rutgers University Press, 2004.

O’Donnell, Ellen, Jamey Gambrell, and Yevgeny Barabanov. Adaptation and Negation of Socialist Realism: Contemporary Soviet Art. Exh. cat. Paret, Peter, Beth Irwin Lewis, and Paul Paret. Persuasive Images: Posters of War and Revolution from the Hoover Institution Archives. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992.

Ridgefield: Aldrich Museum of Contemporary Art, 1990.

Roberts, Norma, ed. The Quest for Self-Expression: Painting in Moscow and Leningrad, 1965–1990. Exh. cat. Columbus: Columbus Museum of Art, 1990.

Rosenfeld, Alla, ed. Defining Russian Graphic Arts, 1898–1934. New Brunswick and London: Rutgers University Press and the Zimmerli Art Museum, 1999.

Rosenfeld, Alla, and Norton T. Dodge, eds. From Gulag to Glasnost: Nonconformist Art from the Soviet Union. New York: Thames and Hudson, 1995.

Rosenfeld, Alla, ed. Moscow Conceptualism in Context. New Brunswick: Zimmerli Art Museum; Munich: Prestel, 2011.

Ross, David, ed. Between Spring and Summer: Soviet Conceptual Art in the Era of Late

Communism. Exh. cat. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1990.

Samizdat: Alternative Culture in Central and Eastern Europe: 1960s to 1980s. Bremen: Edition Temmen, 2000.

White, Stephen. The Bolshevik Poster. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1988.




[1] Artists working in other media also contributed to the collective aim of developing a new society.



[2] See Konstantin Akinsha, “Between Lent and Carnival: Moscow Conceptualism and Sots Art (Differences, Similarities, Interconnections). A Series of Interviews,” in Moscow Conceptualism in Context, ed. Alla Rosenfeld (New Brunswick: Zimmerli Art Museum, with Prestel Verlag, 2011), 24-47.